Nuevo Perú: TRUMP: “HABEMUS PAPAM!”

Hereby we publish an article of Nuevo Peru, with few corrections.

Ideologically the dominant, exploitative and oppressive order, is also in crisis as evidenced by Trump’s choice as the head of Yankee imperialism, the unique hegemonic imperialist superpower, which is nothing but an expression of the bankruptcy of old principles that fall apart under blows of the galloping economic crisis, of the increasingly advanced decomposition of the world imperialist system and the political expiration of the reaction; And this is precisely the main thing, the crisis of the demo-bourgeois principles and their social plan extends your political expiration.

Therefore, ideological crisis, moral crisis of the religious institutions at their service such as the Catholic Church and the Papacy.

They intend as always defending the existing social order, being their ideological shield because the ideology of the reaction, the ideology of imperialism has expired and then accommodating, continuing to survive, plus the perspective will be different. They are to survive in the new conditions of a transformation that knows that it necessarily comes.

Brief presentation of the facts in relation to the new head of the Catholic Church, Leo XIV:

May 8, 2025, it was announced that the American Robert Prevost was presented to the thousands of faithful gathered in the Plaza de San Pedro, after being elected in the fourth vote, on the second day of the conclave. As the new Pope of the Catholic Church, elected in the fourth vote on the second day of the conclave, in which 133 cardinals around the world chose Francisco’s successor.

Prevost becomes the third elected Pope in the 21st century. In 2005, Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) and in 2013, Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Francisco). The American adopts the name of Leo XIV.

Brief “Pastoral” biography:

Prevost was born in Chicago, United States, on September 14, 1955.

He was ordained a priest in 1982 and three years later he would arrive in Chulucanas, Piura (Peru), in 1985. He returned to Peru in 1988 to direct the Augustinian Seminary of Trujillo for ten years.

In 2014, Pope Francis put him in charge of the Diocese of Chiclayo, being designated as bishop of this city a year later. After being appointed, Prevost had to naturalize as a Peruvian, in order to fulfill one of the concordats between the Vatican and the country.

An important fact in his biography, which paints his “missionary” work and his ecumenical institution is, according to the press release, the following:

“On December 27, 2017, two days after the irregular pardon of the deceased Alberto Fujimori occurred; in his capacity as Chiclayo bishop, Robert Prevost recommended the former president to apologize to each of his victims of his government, in order to be able to enter a reconciliation process. He said:

“Former President Alberto Fujimori asked forgiveness in a way, let’s say generic, almost. Recognizing only in general terms if some have felt offended. Perhaps, on their part, it would be more effective to ask for forgiveness, personally, for some of the great injustices that were committed and for which he was judged and sentenced … in order to be able to enter a reconciliation process. At another time, the new Pope Leo XIV also asked the Protestants who in 2017 rejected the pardon of Alberto Fujimori expressing themselves peacefully in the streets, without insults or violence, so as not to generate more divisionism.

“You have to put aside the struggles and political discussions, and seek how we can move the country forward … I believe that you have to summon everyone to a process of reflection, to seek yes the truth, because, unfortunately, the lies also cost,” he said when he was a bishop of Chiclayo. “

And, the note, despite his claim to put the new Pope through the clouds, painting him as the “Pope of Peace with Justice” and of the “reflection”, ends up denouncing the false of his position of that moment, of wanting to bless the pardon to the “truth”, the “forgiveness” and the “reconciliation”, let’s read:

“It should be noted that Alberto Fujimori’s pardon was granted as part of an exchange of votes and favors. Therefore, ten months later, in October 2018, the Supreme Court annulled that measure because it lacked legal effects and ordered its immediate capture. Fujimori died on September 11, 2024.” (May 09 2025 | Robert Prevost recommended Alberto Fujimori ask for forgiveness to his victims when he was a bishop of Chiclayo by Carlos Contreras Chipana for RPP)

Note is that the LOD rats have celebrated the news of the Premost’s choice such as the “Pope of Reconciliation.” That is talking on the peace of the cemeteries.

2018 exercised as second vice president of the Peruvian Episcopal Conference, from where he faced the serious crisis for the abuses of the Sodalicio de Life Christian, among other issues. He was also Apostolic Administrator of Callao between 2020 and 2021.

In 2023, Francisco appointed him prefect of the Dicasterio for bishops and, also, president of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America.

Leo XVI as his predecessor and Putative Father Francisco also carries a stain under his white and immaculate papal cassock.

Francisco’s was caused by its implication with the repression and disappearance of four members of his Jesuit order by the Argentine military jet, despite the “cleaning certificate” granted by some connoted defenders of human rights, evidence persecuted him until his recent death.

With Prevost something similar happens because of its complicity with the abuses of the Sodalicio (pedophilia), which is part of the universal scandal to which the Catholic Church is subjected among others. Its like in the previous case, but this time they are the “research journalist” who also rush to extend their “cleaning certificate.

About the name adopted by the new Pope:

The Vatican spokesman stressed that the election of Leo XIV as the name of the new Pope is a reference to the modern social doctrine of the Church, which began with ‘Rerum Novarum’, the encyclical of Pope Leo XIII.

He added that “it is also clearly a non -random reference to working men and women in an era of artificial intelligence.” The ‘Rerum Novarum’, which can be translated as ‘of the new things’ and that is entitled ‘Encyclical Charter Rerum Novarum of the Supreme León XIII on the situation of the workers’, was published on May 15, 1891 in Rome. (International Drafting, May 9 (EFE).

Important fact to understand what this new Pope and the Catholic Church are brought, it is necessary to remember two events of the Church to adapt to the “new situations” of the class struggle in the world and that are a history to understand the nature of those who now head and represent it, these are:

– The Second Vatican Council was the twenty -first ecumenical council of the Catholic Church that had as its main purpose the relationship between the Church and the modern world. It was summoned by Pope John XXIII, who announced it on January 25, 1959.

Remember that for this, they themselves baptized it later as “the Church of the times”, that is to say that defends the current order of oppression and exploitation and, as they are aware and have survived the passage of a class society to another, they think they can survive in the new times when socialism is imposed in the world, world, which will not be possible, because of the difference to the previous societies based on the exploitation. The new society for which the world proletariat fights will be a society without exploited or exploiters.

The Council met in October 1962 in four sessions or stages until its closure on December 8, 1965 by Paul VI. From this event we will make a brief comment about its pastoral constitution Gaudium et Spes about the Church in today’s world to tie it with the defense of private property that makes the “Rerum Novarum” as continuation.

– And, another event or document to take into account is the encyclical “Centesimus Annus” (1-V-1991), which was officially presented like this:

“One hundred years after the encyclical “Rerum Novarum” and after the conclusion, with the twilight of Marxism, a cycle in the history of Europe and the world, Juan Paul II publishes a social document that discovers and analyzes the” new things “(encyclical “Centesimus Annus” (1-v-1991) Almudi.org. John Paul II, Fernando Monge. Aceprensa, service 68/91 1991).

For us it is clear the role of ideological shield in favor of imperialism and the global reaction that the Catholic Church fulfills and that it specifically and organically concretizes it.

We will refer to the official position of the papacy and the Official positions of the Church in Peru in order to better understand the character and reactionary essence, counterrevolutionary that the Church maintains in general.

We will also refer to the “missionary” work of Prevost in Peru and Latin America, such as the defense of the world power of the Catholic Church because here is half of the Catholics in the world and, in collusion and struggle, such as the defense of imperialism, mainly Yankee, because in Latin America it is the main one that dominates us and this the strategic basis of its world hegemony.

MARXISM AND RELIGIOUS QUESTION:

To combat it, we will begin with the just and accurate the words of President Gonzalo in the interview:

“Marx taught us that “religion is the opiate of the people”. This is a Marxist thesis which is completely valid today, and in the future. Marx also held that religion is a social phenomenon that is the product of exploitation and it will be eliminated as exploitation is swept away and a new society emerges. These are principles that we can’t ignore, and that we must always keep in mind. Related to the previous point, it must be remembered that the people are religious, something which never has and never will prevent them from struggling for their basic class interests, and in this way serving the revolution, and in particular the People’s War. I want to make it absolutely clear that we respect this religiousness as a question of freedom of religious beliefs, as recognized by the programme which was approved by our Congress.”

“The question of the “new evangelism” refers explicitly to how ecclesiastical authority, the Pope in particular, sees the role of Latin America, where, as they themselves say and the current Pope said in 1984, half the world’s Catholics live. They are, consequently, trying to use the 500th anniversary of the discovery of America to push forward a so-called movement of “new evangelism”. In sum, this is what they hope for: since evangelism officially began in 1494 following the discovery of America, with this new centennial they want to develop a “new evangelism” in defense of their bastion, this half of the “parish”, half of the bastion that sustains them in power. This is their goal. In this way, the hierarchy and the Papacy aim to defend their position in America and serve US imperialism, the dominant imperialist power in Latin America.”

“But we have to understand this plan in the context of a campaign and a worldwide plan, linked to its relations with the Soviet Union on the occasion of the millennium of its Christianization, the ties with Chinese revisionism, the actions of the Church in Poland, the Ukraine, etc. It is a worldwide plan and the “new evangelism” operates within it. As always they are attempting to defend the existing social order, to be its ideological shield, because the ideology of reaction, of imperialism, has become decrepit. In the future they will again seek to adapt in order to survive. But the prospects will be different, not like things were before. Marx’s law will assert itself: religion will wither away as exploitation and oppression are destroyed and eliminated. And since the Papacy serves the exploiting classes and what will follow is not an exploiting class, the Papacy will not be able to survive, and religion itself will wither away. In the meantime the freedom of religious belief has to be recognized until mankind advancing through new objective conditions, comes to possess a clear, scientific and world-transforming consciousness. We must therefore, analyze the “new evangelism” in the context of this plan of the Church to survive under new conditions, a transformation that they know must come.“

To be continued