Nuevo Peru – The war in the Greater Middle East repeats a great lesson

Hereby, we publish and article by Association Nuevo Perú

For us, the key point is Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, because the problem is having a just and correct ideological and political line, and there cannot be a just and correct political line if there is no just and correct ideology; that is why we believe that the key to everything is ideology: Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, mainly Maoism. Secondly, developing Communist Parties. Why? Because the masses are thirsty for revolution, the masses are ready and they cry out for revolution; so the problem is not with them. The proletariat cries out for revolution, the oppressed nations, the peoples of the world cry out for revolution, so we need to develop Communist Parties. The rest, I repeat, is done by the masses, who are the ones who make history and who are going to sweep away imperialism and world reaction with People’s War.” (Chairman Gonzalo).

The bourgeois press reports:

On Monday, Israel intensified its air campaign against Hezbollah, launching large-scale attacks. It was the deadliest day of Israeli attacks on Lebanon since the 2006 war and affected several areas of the country, mainly in the south and east, near the border with Syria, where the militant group has a strong presence.

Among the dead and wounded are women, children and doctors, the Lebanese Ministry of Health reported on Monday. It is not clear how many of the victims were civilians or Hezbollah militants, but many of the places described by Israel as Hezbollah targets are also residential neighborhoods and villages.

On Tuesday, Hezbollah said it fired multiple rounds of rockets into northern Israel, targeting the Ramat David airbase, the Meggido airfield and the Amos base, all located near the northern Israeli town of Afula.

Israel claimed it was targeting Hezbollah infrastructure, but videos show the destruction of residential areas and the high death toll reflects the scale and intensity of the attacks.

The nearly 500 dead on Monday are about half of the Lebanese who died during the 34-day war between Israel and Hezbollah in 2006.

Israeli warplanes were also seen flying over different parts of the country late in the afternoon, including Mount Lebanon, where Hezbollah does not have a prominent presence.

Lebanon’s representative to the United Nations General Assembly said there was a mass “exodus” of people fleeing. A Lebanese NGO said more than 100,000 people have been displaced.

Hezbollah and Israel have been at odds for decades, but both have stepped up their cross-border attacks since last October, when Israel’s war on Gaza began following the Palestinian militant group Hamas’ deadly attack on Israel on October 7.

Last week, Hezbollah – one of the region’s most powerful paramilitary forces – was reeling from a deadly double attack by Israel, when pagers and walkie-talkies used by Hezbollah members exploded simultaneously across the country. The attack was followed by an Israeli strike on a building in a densely populated area of southern Beirut, which killed at least 45 people, including a senior officer and other officials, as well as women and children. The following days saw some of the heaviest exchanges of fire between Israel and Hezbollah in nearly a year of war in Gaza, as the Lebanese militant group fired projectiles deeper into Israeli territory than seen before and Israel fired hundreds of projectiles toward southern Lebanon.

In New York, on the occasion of the UN General Assembly, and behind the scenes, feverish efforts are underway to persuade Israel not to escalate and launch a ground incursion into Lebanon.

Although the United States is Israel’s closest ally and largest arms supplier, a senior State Department official said the United States and its partners are trying to find a diplomatic solution. The US believes that neither Israel nor Hezbollah are interested in a full-scale war, but one of the main concerns is that Iran, one of Hezbollah’s main supporters, will get involved, US officials told CNN. (source CNN, today)

The lessons of history of this confrontation between the armed struggle of national resistance of the Lebanese people against the imperialist-Zionist war of aggression

The current war of aggression of Yankee imperialism-Zionism against the oppressed nations of the Greater Middle East (MOA), whose main axis of aggression goes from the Gaza Strip to Lebanon, repeats a great lesson, which must be extracted from this:

“They exalt to the clouds the military power of the United States” and of the Zionist State of Israel, “its highest and most modern technology.”

Which, as Chairman Gonzalo said, is a reissue of the main thing being the weapons, the power resides in the most modern weapons, weapons can do everything – that is what they proclaim. And he concludes: “When, precisely, the first great lesson that we must draw from the Gulf War is that the main thing in war is the man, the ideology that animates him, the class that leads him, the interests that he defends and the cause that he serves.”

That is the lesson, increasingly powerful and current, of what has been going on in the present war against the Palestinian people, the Arab and Iranian people and what interests us as a lesson for the People’s War and to unmask fallacies.

And reading the following note on the history of such a war we can draw some lessons that show us the invincibility of the armed struggle of national resistance in Lebanon and of all that region of the planet.

THE HISTORY

Lebanon has been involved in the Palestinian question since 1948, due to the forced displacement of Palestinian refugees, through the massacres and terror of the Zionist occupier. In 1948, 770,000 people were displaced from the Palestinian territory conquered by the Zionists and imperialists, of which 100,000 arrived in Lebanon and just over 75,000 in Syria. In 1965 there were already 180,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, after the Six-Day War in 1967 the number rose to 350,000, reaching 375,000 in 1982 when Israel invaded Lebanon. With the Palestinians came the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Today, there are millions of Palestinians who demand the return to their Palestinian homeland taken by colonialism.

The Lebanese civil war, the clashes between the Palestinian fedayeen and Lebanese Sunnis and Christian militiamen in Sidon in April 1975 put an end to the covert war. The Sunnis and the Palestinians occupied Beirut and expelled the government in power. In June 1976, the Syrian army occupied Lebanon and forced the Sunni-Palestinian coalition to retreat to the border with Israel. Lebanon is entering a new division, and the imperialists, with their instrument Israel, are going after the spoils.

In this situation, the Shiites whose political rights had been recognized in 1974, led by the cleric Musa Sadr, created the first armed organization whose goal was the recovery of the Shiite territory, then the scene of fighting between Palestinians and Sunnis and Christians, as well as the defense of its members; it was called “Amal”, an acronym for Afwaj al-Muqawama al-Lubnaniya, Detachments of the Lebanese Resistance, which means hope.

The wars of aggression of Zionism and Yankee imperialism against Lebanon after their wars of aggression and conquest of 1948 and 1967 against Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon:

1. The so-called “Operation Litani” (1978)

Israel invaded Lebanon under the pretext of weakening the PLO and containing the growing Syrian influence, without neglecting the acquisition of important agricultural resources provided by the Litani River.

Israel supported the creation of Christian militias in the south, the most powerful of which was the South Lebanon Army (SLA), and indirectly began to affect the Sunni-Palestinian alliance, which was fought by the Syrian army. Syria, faced with Israeli aggression in Lebanon, reached a truce with the PLO and allowed the Palestinians to move heavy artillery and commandos to the border strip with Israel to fight the new Christian militias. Israel had the ideal pretext to invade Lebanon. On March 14, 1978, 20,000 Israeli soldiers invaded southern Lebanon, forced the Palestinians to retreat and created a “security strip” that extended along the entire banks of the Litani River, which meant the occupation of 10% of Lebanese territory.

On March 19, United Nations Resolutions 425 and 426 called for the withdrawal of Israeli military forces, to be replaced by blue helmets, initially 4,000 soldiers, and 2,000 more in May; however, these were placed between the area controlled by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and Lebanon, that is, allowing Israel to control the territory up to the banks of the Litani River.

Although the withdrawal of Israeli troops was gradually completed, and the UN mission created according to Resolution 425, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was installed in the territory, Israel kept the border open to enter freely if support was required for its Christian allies, to whom it entrusted the security of the area. This means about 800 km² controlled by Israel (of the 10,400 km² that make up the entire Lebanese territory), and the free crossing of its “militia allies” (in reality its auxiliary occupation forces) to receive military training and support, as well as social assistance and medical benefits.

For the Lebanese, the toll was 2,000 civilians dead, 80% of the population in the south damaged, and more than 200,000 displaced, while Israel had only 16 casualties.

2. The so-called “Operation Peace for Galilee” (1982) of the Zionists

Lebanon had become the backyard of the power struggle between Israel and Syria. Both countries sought control of Lebanon.

Israel acted against the Lebanese Muslim militias and the Palestinians through their Christian allies. UNIFIL showed its inefficiency. In this situation, Israel decided to take control of the Litani River basin for economic and security purposes. On June 6, 1982, 100,000 Israeli soldiers invaded Lebanon under the pretext of guaranteeing the security of civilian settlements in Galilee, and of finishing off the PLO in Lebanon once and for all. Israel decided to attack Beirut from the air, where the Palestinian operations center was located, deliberately and excessively bombing the civilian population, which suffered 20,000 dead, 40,000 wounded and 600,000 displaced; and by June 13, the IDF (the Zionist armed forces) reached the outskirts of Beirut, prolonging the bombing for two more months.

On August 13, a new multinational force made up of France, the United States and Italy arrived in Beirut to evacuate PLO guerrillas from Lebanon during a ceasefire. This task was completed by September of the same year. However, Israel did not retreat behind the multinational force, they only abandoned Beirut, but not the occupied territory in the south.

In the face of this situation, AMAL, the organization created by Sard, had remained somewhat on the sidelines. On October 16, 1983, when 50,000 Shiites gathered in Nabatiyeh for Ashura, the day that commemorates the assassination of Imam Hussein (the main martyr of Shiism), an Israeli military convoy on patrol broke into the crowd; the enraged Shiites refused to let them through and the Israelis forced their way through; the crowd began throwing stones at them and overturned the vehicles, and a shootout broke out, leaving two Shiites dead and 15 wounded.

When the multinational force returned to Beirut that same month, with the help of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, the Lebanese National Resistance (LNR) was organized in southern Lebanon, which later became Hezbollah, whose most notorious action was on October 23, 1985 in Beirut: 243 American marines were killed when a truck loaded with explosives crashed into their barracks near the international airport. But, on April 18, 63 people died when the American embassy in Beirut was also attacked with a truck packed with explosives; and although the United States condemned the attacks, it was unable to penetrate its structure, or even identify it, and proceeded to immediately withdraw its troops.

The Israeli military presence, with special concentration in the Beqaa Valley, incited the Shiite community to rise up in arms. The personification of this rebellion is Hezbollah.

Since the 1982 “Peace for Galilee” operation, Hezbollah’s military activities have become more professional and have increased; from June 1985 to April 1986 there were 800 attacks or attempted attacks against the IDF. The Israeli government chose to withdraw its troops along the entire border, but to maintain a zone extending from the border line to 45 km inside Lebanese territory. This “security strip” was created because Hezbollah’s use of sophisticated and long-range weapons, such as heavy artillery and Katyusha missiles, would threaten Israeli settlements if there was nothing to distance them on the Lebanese side.

The Israeli strategy involved its “Christian ally” (its auxiliary force): the South Lebanese Army (SLA). The SLA was to settle in the “security strip” to control it and continue fighting Hezbollah militias there, while the IDF would remain inside Israeli territory as support. This action was concluded on June 10, 1985 as the Israeli government declared that its military presence in Lebanon was officially over.

The Taif Accords ended the civil war in Lebanon and called for elections in 1992.

Hezbollah thus secured a place in parliament as a political organization and would remain armed on the grounds because it was a fight not against the Lebanese government or its factions, but against a real military occupation, and has remained the only functioning militia in Lebanon ever since. In April 1991, its leadership made the decision to participate in the 1992 elections, with its television station Al Manar (which began operations in 1989), its radio station Al Nour, and its weekly newspaper Al Ahed. In May of that same year, Sheikh Abbas Al Musawi, a pragmatic man, was appointed Secretary General.

According to reports: Through five main social institutions, officially recognized by the Lebanese State, Hezbollah penetrates all sectors of daily life: Jihad al Bina, for example, is dedicated to the reconstruction of houses, schools and mosques and theological seminaries. The organization for the relief of the population operates a fund to financially support the poorest families, whether through scholarships, loans or food supplies. The organization also has Al Jarih, a health committee that cares for veterans, has three hospitals, more than 40 clinics in Beirut, as well as pharmacies with subsidized prices and the Shahid Nursing School, the prices of medical services cost a quarter of what those of the State cost. Hezbollah even has programs to support farmers through cooperatives and a reforestation program.

3. Major Zionist imperialist aggression against Lebanon: “Operation Responsibility” (1993) and “Operation V” (1994).

The armed struggle of national resistance continues mainly in the “security strip” with failure for the Zionist forces, the IDF and the SLA. Hezbollah applied mixed offensive tactics.

Israeli troops were attacked by surprise not only by attacks on the front but sometimes deep in the ‘security zone’. It is not just the usual bomb left at the road, but attacks on Israeli positions using high-caliber weapons ranging from armored artillery to surface-to-air missiles and heavy machine gun fire. They have even succeeded in engaging in combat for several hours in an area of between ten and fifteen kilometers, at the end of which they have successfully slipped out of the area taking the heavy weapons with them without being captured.” (1997)

On June 25, 1993, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzak Rabin, ordered the start of “Operation Responsibility.” However, despite the tremendous destruction, Hezbollah continued to fire its Katyushas at a steady pace with no sign of weakening, and the Lebanese government refused to get involved.

The United States took the initiative to promote a ceasefire. The bombing ended on July 31, leaving 147 Lebanese dead (only 8 of them Hezbollah militants), 500 wounded, and 350,000 displaced due to the loss of 75 villages and about 10,000 houses, along with infrastructure such as roads, schools, hospitals, and mosques.

Hezbollah was so unswayed that it carried out about 1,030 operations in the “security strip” between 1990 and 1995, and this number would increase from 1996 to 2000 to 4,928 due to a second violation of the “rules of the game” during that second five-year period.

The skirmishes and clashes between the two sides did not cease. The response was “Operation Grapes of Wrath”, launched on the 11th of that month with the same objectives as “Operation Responsibility”, with the only difference that the actions were even more brutal, such as the one that took place on the 18th of April in the town of Qana when 17 155mm projectiles were fired by helicopters of the Israeli Air Force (IAF) on a complex of buildings that the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) used as a base for the blue helmets, and that day gave shelter to about 800 people who were escaping the crossfire between Hezbollah and the IAF.

The armed struggle of national resistance wins a great victory

The Israeli withdrawal in 2000

The continued defeats of the Zionists on the battlefield and, as they say, the image of Israel in the world after the operations “Responsibility” and “Grapes of Wrath” was badly damaged and the pressure of the international community, reflected in Resolutions 425 and 426 promulgated by the Security Council of the United Nations forced the government of Barak as Prime Minister to seek to negotiate with Syria a withdrawal that would guarantee the security of its troops and therefore of the militias of the SLA (Israel was certainly looking for an honorable way out but on this occasion there would be no heroes for this country). The role of Syria was important given that Lebanon, invoking the UN resolutions, refused to grant security guarantees for Galilee because nothing obliged it to do so. However, Syria demanded the return of the Golan Heights before proceeding to negotiate a peace treaty, which Israel refused to do, causing such negotiations to fail.

With no other options left, Barak, the Zionist leader at the time, completed the unilateral withdrawal of the IDF from southern Lebanon on May 24, 2000, and after them the majority of the militants (about 6,000) of the disintegrated SLA and their families, who Israel agreed to make citizens. Others, however, were taken prisoner by Hezbollah or the Lebanese Army when their disbandment began in 1999, and sentenced to four or five years of hard labor.

Hezbollah gains its legitimacy from an armed resistance movement against an invading force, an inclusive nationalism, a remarkable religious tolerance, and an attachment to the electoral policies of a re-established democracy, as well as a recognition of the State that fed back its legitimacy as an armed organization, but it maintains a radical and violent force in the face of an external enemy.

4. The Zionist-imperialist enemy attacks Lebanon again

The 2006 War of Aggression

On July 13, the Israeli air force bombed Beirut airport, rendering it unusable, while a total blockade of Lebanese airspace and coasts was completed that same day by the navy and air force. This was done with the purpose of preventing Hezbollah from supplying itself with weapons and other resources and proceeding to eliminate it by military means. A plan called “Icebreaker” was chosen, which consisted of massive air strikes on Lebanese territory to avoid the use of ground forces and incur fewer casualties.

Hezbollah responded strongly by firing Katyusha and Fajr rockets into Israeli territory in response to civilian damage.

By July 14, Israel began bombing Hezbollah infrastructure throughout Lebanon, from its offices in Beirut to long-range missile sites and bunkers, but also roads, bridges, residential areas, schools, power plants, aqueducts and other economic infrastructure. Yet, Hezbollah would demonstrate a high degree of preparedness: on the same day after Hezbollah’s offices were bombed, a recording was broadcast in which Nasrallah invited the population of Beirut to take a look at the sea, and with great theatricality “an explosion on the horizon hit the INS Hanit, an Israeli Navy ship that was hit by an Iranian-made C-802 Noor guided missile. The ship was disabled and four of its sailors were killed.

Despite the punishment inflicted on the entire country, on July 16, Hezbollah surprised its enemy at the city of Haifa. The IAF managed to destroy, in various subsequent missions, around 44 Zelzal-2 and Zelzal-1 rockets, the latter with a range of between 150 and up to 200 km, and more than half of the Fajr 50 rocket launchers and sites. But against all odds, Hezbollah continued to attack Israeli forces with Katyusha rockets at a rate of about 150 rockets a day, and up to 250 on the last day of the war.

Faced with this situation, a UN negotiating team arrived in Lebanon during these first days. Kofi Annan, then General Secretary, together with the support of France, Russia, and the European Union in general, proposed the establishment of an immediate ceasefire, since they considered the Israeli reaction to be a disproportionate action, but they were met with the refusal of the United States to pressure Israel, since Washington claimed a legitimate defense of Israel against an aggression by Hezbollah, directly accusing Syria and Iran of allowing and promoting it.

As time went on and US pressure failed to come, the conflict dragged on, because the US in particular saw a great opportunity to weaken Iran and its growing influence in the Levant, so it vetoed all efforts at the UN to give Israel time to destroy Hezbollah and then proceed to have a joint force of Blue Helmets and the Lebanese Army retake control of southern Lebanon.

Once Israeli ground forces confronted Hezbollah militias, a previously unknown feature proved to be very useful for Hezbollah’s combat strategies, which applied both guerrilla tactics and prolonged direct confrontations: an extensive network of bunkers and underground fortifications secretly built by Hezbollah throughout southern Lebanon.

On August 11, the Security Council unanimously issued Resolution 1701, which established a ceasefire and the deployment of 15,000 Blue Helmets to join UNIFIL to restore order in southern Lebanon, respecting the “Blue Line” as the border between the two countries. It also reiterated the importance of complying with Resolution 1559 on the disarmament of all Lebanese militias, leaving only the Lebanese armed forces in charge of national security. Needless to say, this last point could not be implemented because UNIFIL is not authorized to disarm Hezbollah, but this is a decision that concerns only the Lebanese government.

Hostilities continued until August 14, the agreed date for the ceasefire, but skirmishes and clashes continued until August 23, when the withdrawal of Israeli troops was completed. The naval and air blockade of Lebanon was not lifted until September 8.

During the 34 days of conflict, the IAF carried out 11,897 missions and dropped 13,916 bombs, while Hezbollah carried out 475 rocket attacks. The Israeli Navy carried out some 2,500 airstrikes, and about 2,000 IDF soldiers were deployed in southern Lebanon and about 3,000 more remained along the border; in total, the IDF mobilized about 10,000 reservists.

The intensity of this confrontation left about 1,200 civilians (almost a third of them children) dead, 4,000 wounded, and one million displaced. Nearly 130,000 homes, thousands of small businesses, hundreds of roads, 300 factories, 80 bridges, dozens of schools and hospitals, and the country’s electricity grid were destroyed or damaged; economic losses were estimated at about $7 billion, while the country simultaneously had to deal with an external debt equivalent to 180% of its GDP. In contrast, Israel suffered 43 civilian casualties, and destruction or damage to some 6,000 apartments and businesses, and military expenditures are estimated to have amounted to some $1.6 billion.

Despite the genocidal violence of the Zionist enemy against the people of Lebanon, Hezbollah’s popularity remained, not only because in the eyes of the Arab world it gave Israel an armed defeat, but also because it reinforced its aid to the population.

Previous post ECUADOR: ON THE AGGRESSION OF IMPERIALISM ON LEBANON
Next post SUCCESSFUL GLOBAL DAY OF ACTION AUGUST 26 2024